Auto Translate

Feature story

Solving conflicts with bears in the Eastern Carpathians


The Polish part of the Eastern Carpathians is characterized by a sparse population, but despite this the inhabitants still have to share the landscape with bears. Their presence has caused conflicts in relation to animal husbandry (sheep, goats, cows and horses), beekeeping, and recently tourism too. Stefan Jakimiuk explains how those conflicts were solved together with the local communities.

Story by

Stefan Jakiumiuk



Conservation/Nature Parks




Pomeranian, Poland

Chapter 1


The Polish part of the Eastern Carpathians is characterized by a sparse population. However, before World War II, the density of human population in this area was high and bears were sparse. Post-war action of removing a large number of indigenous inhabitants from this area caused depopulation in this region. Wild nature returned to abandoned areas, and along with it, bears. Currently, the area of ​​the Eastern Carpathians is one of the most attractive natural areas in Poland. However, human activities taking place here, such as animal husbandry (sheep, goats, cows and horses), beekeeping, and recently tourism also cause conflicts. Since 1953, the bear is a strictly protected species in Poland. Therefore, the State Treasury is obliged to pay compensation for damage caused by these animals.

Chapter 2


The most common cause of conflicts is damage caused by brown bears looking for food near human settlements, e.g. in apiaries, orchards, or amongst farm animals. They are getting used to the presence of humans and are therefore not afraid of entering villages. Although this is a new problem, it is one of the most important issues. Since most people don’t know how to keep bears away due to a lack of knowledge, education is another important activity to prevent encounters and damage before they occur in the first place.

Chapter 3


Bear-safe garbage containers

Preventing access to rubbish is a very important activity to avoid conflicts between bears and human. The containers should be specially designed so that bears were neither able to open nor destroy them. They should be placed along busy mountain trails or in car parks, where people leave a lot of waste, including organic waste. In addition several electric fences can be installed to protect large garbage containers located near mountain huts, in garbage sorting areas and to protect composters. These safeguards are only 100% effective if the waste is placed inside the containers. If the garbage is outside, the smell of the garbage will attract animals.

Report your experience with this tool

Piotr Chmielewski


1. Monitoring of bear population. Monitoring of the bear population in the Carpathians is carried out using a variety of methods: observation, tracking and registration of other bears. phototraps, DNA analysis. telemetry on selected individuals. Minimizing conflicts within beekeepers and bears. 2. As part of the bear protection projects, the WWF Poland donated more than 60 sets of electrical shepherds to beekeepers from the Podkarpackie Voivodeship. 3. Counteracting the habits of the bears. 4. Protection of the bears' liars. An important element of the bear protection project is the protection of liars used by them during wintertime. In the years 2007-2010, research was commissioned by the WWF Poland to locate and measure gavers in the Bieszczady Mountains, Beskid Żywiecki and Tatra Mountains. Potential factors have also been identified that have had a negative impact on wintering bears and recommendations have been made in the report. 5. Enrichment of bear food base. As part of the WWF Poland project, over one thousand young fruit trees were planted and fenced. The nursing work has been carried out on over 3,000 fruit trees in orchards located in abandoned villages of the Bieszczady mountains 6. Education and awareness raising. The WWF Poland runs a wide range of educational activities to increase knowledge about the bears in society. In addition to press releases, TV shows, events, leaflets and brochures, information about the progress of the project can be found on the Foundation's website. There are also photos and fixtures with bears recorded using video clips. WWF Poland regularly publishes press releases and initiates the production of articles, radio and television programs devoted to these carnivores. The WWF Poland cooperation with beekepers leads to conflict resolution and mitigates negative attitudes towards brown bears protection. Thanks to the distribution of large-scale educational leaflets to hikers directly in mountain shelters, people's understanding of behaviors in the face of carnivore encounters increases, and increases the awareness of the role of waste in the process of bear habits. This was a non-binding measure implemented by WWF Poland in the frame of Protection of brown bear in the Polish part of the Carpathians in a province in the Polish part of Carpathians, especially Bieszczady Mountains. It specifically involved Journalists, Beekeepers, General public, Administrative staff (government). It operated for 4 years (from 2011 to 2015) and received financial support from CKPŚ / NFOŚiGW - Center for the Coordination of Environmental Projects/ National Fund of Environmental Protection and Water Management.Please reply to this post for more information or reach out directly to Nuria Selva Fernandez.

Jergus Tesak


The projec B.E.A.R.S was a startup project for implementation of the idea to protect the garbage against bear visit which results to general decrease of bear visits and danger in urban areas. After this project was implemented, more projects has been done later by State nature conservancy SR, or local multicipalities at all. After years of the practice even it is implmented also in our legislation many of multicipalities still didn´t implment thist tool yet. Using of the special containers or well fenced container stations is very efficient tool as a prevention in case of risk of dangerous bear visit. Even there are still some shortcomings this measure is on a good way to be implemented on the national scale. This was a non-binding measure implemented by Slovak Wildlife society, State nature conservancy SR, Multicipalities in the frame of B.E.A.R.S in municipality / municipalities in the Starý Smokovec, and other Towns and villages. It specifically involved Mayors, General public. It operated for 11 years (from 2003 to 2014) and received financial support from Own funds, EU funds, Other sources, WWF Dánsko c/o WWF Danu− be−Carpathian Programme Office vo Viedni, ako aj organizácia Alertis − fund for bear and nature conservation, WSPA, The Slovak Wildlife Society s programom ecotourizmu “Wolves, Bears & Eagles”, I. Sherlock, M. Cornish, Reproservis Liptovský Mikuláš, The British Trust for Conservation Volunteers, The People’s Trust for Endangered Species..Please reply to this post for more information or reach out directly to .

Electric Fences for Apiaries

Previous research and practice shows that the use of electric fences significantly limits the access of bears to apiaries, waste dumps and anthropogenic food (Strorer et al. 1938, Davies and Rockwell 1986, Latour and Hagen 1993, Huygens and Hayashi 1999, Clarc et al. 2005). The effectiveness of electric fences was rated at 70-100% by these authors. For beekeepers, they are a possibility to protect their bees and  honey. The electric shepherds used here were equipped with special solar panels which significantly prolonged the operation of their batteries, which was absolutely crucial. Additionally, the fence should not touch the grass or branches of trees and shrubs (grounding).

Report your experience with this tool

Chapter 4

Reducing conflicts


A total of 50 containers were installed from 2013 to 2014. During the 9 years of our work in this area, we provided 150 sets of electric shepherds to protect apiaries against bears. Between 2009 and 2010, we checked the effectiveness of the fences. Of 35 apiaries protected by electric shepherds, damage re-occurred only twice. In one case, the electric fence had not been working properly because it had been damaged by falling branches. In the second case, it was the lack of electric voltage caused by battery discharge (after winter) that meant the bears could get into the area of ​​the apiary.

Sometimes a particularly clever individual animal may be able to overcome the security measures. In such cases compensation must be paid. To keep damages at a minimum it is crucial to protect the apiaries. This is because, as one beekeeper in the Eastern Carpathians region said, "I can only support the protection of these beautiful animals if they don’t destroy my income".


The tools described above are effective. However, if they are not used in the proper way, they will not be a 100% reliable. So it’s not just about the tools but about educating the people in how to use them.

Damage Claim Process for Subcarpathian icon


Select country:

Compensation Scheme in PL

According to art. 126 para 1 of the Polish Act on Nature Conservation The State Treasury is liable for damages caused by:
- wolves - in the livestock;
- lynx - in the livestock;
- bears - in apiaries, livestock and crops;
Art. 126 para 2 states that responsibility does not include lost profits, e.g. possible future profits from the sale of young animals.
Visual inspection and damage assessment, as well as determination of the amount of compensation and its payment, is made by the regional director of environmental protection, and in the area of ​​the national park, the director of this park.
Owners or users of agricultural and forestry farms may cooperate with the Regional Director for Environmental Protection (RDOS), and in the area of ​​the national park with the Director of this park, in the scope of methods of protecting livestock against damage caused by wolves, lynxes and bears. This cooperation may include the construction of facilities or the implementation of treatments to prevent damage, financed from the budget of the locally competent Director of a national park or a Regional Director for Environmental Protection, as part of civil law agreements.
Compensation is not entitled to:
Persons who have been allocated with land owned by the State Treasury;
If the aggrieved party did not consent to the construction by the Regional Director for Environmental Protection or the Director of the national park of facilities or the implementation of treatments to prevent damage;
If the aggrieved party has not made the crop or agricultural produce retrieval within 14 days of the end of the harvest of this plant species in the given region;
For damages incurred in the property of the State Treasury, with the exception of property put into commercial use on the basis of the Civil Code;
For damage not exceeding 100 kg of rye per hectare of crop during the year;
For damage to agricultural crops established in violation of commonly used agrotechnical requirements;
For damages caused by wolves, bears or lynxes in the populations of livestock left, from sunset to sunrise, without direct care.
In disputes regarding the amount of compensation for damages caused by wolves, lynxes and bears, common courts decide.
According to the regulations in force, the remains of the killed animal should be disposed of, calling for a suitable company for this purpose, whose address can be obtained in the commune or poviat veterinary inspectorate (SdN “Wilk”).

Submit story

Would you like to contribute a story?

Let us know!

Recommended articles

Solving conflicts with bears in the Eastern Carpathians


    Please select the province you live in.

    This will allow us to show you information specific for your county.